Jennifer Lopez is combating to keep non-public video footage this lady once acquired with her first spouse, Ojani Noa, from finding the light of day. It — which contains 27 hours of photos — apparently includes love-making situations through the pair’s honeymoon back in 1997. Noa tried to sell the tape, containing sparked a legal battle with the sexy singer.
But the 41-year-old singer was able to get a court docket order with the exception Noa right from releasing the tape, by least for any day. Upon Monday, Seattle County Superior Court docket Judge John Chalfant reigned over in her favor and issued a temporary restraining order stopping the distribution within the film. Nevertheless , the assess declined to quit media sites from logical discussion the racy footage in the event that they happen to get their hands on this.
Noa’s lawyer, Education Meyer, is usually arguing that his customer didn’t disobey any privacy agreements with Lopez if he started shopping the project around. He claims that the photos is not just a sex video tape and says he’s just making a mockumentary regarding the couple’s tumultuous romantic relationship.
Despite the fact that Noa was unable to discharge the movie, he still desires to do so. He reportedly is convinced that the tape is safe to discharge married-dating.org now that Lopez has withdrawn her claim against him while the case was in arbitration. According to In contact magazine, the master tape with the footage happens to be in a central depository yet Meyer believes that they have determined a legal loophole and will be allowed to release it soon.
J Lo’s ex-husband has already been caught together with his hand in the cookie container once before, and the “I Can’t Believe that It” artist isn’t choosing any chances these times. She just lately sued Noa pertaining to $10 , 000, 000 claiming that he breached a privacy agreement if he attempted to sell the home video video footage from their marital relationship, which just lasted 11 months.
Noa has filed his own lawsuit against the alluring star, making claims that the woman wrongfully fired him coming from her Pasadena restaurant 5 years ago. He also attemptedto write a tell-all about their marital life and was blocked by simply Lopez’s attorneys. In that earlier round of litigation, Noa was ordered to pay for the singer money and arranged not to talk about for money any seductive details about the relationship.